TASMANIAN SENATE ELECTIONS 1961 |
|
|
|
FIG. 1-B. AN EVENLY SPREAD VOTE
WOULD HAVE RESULTED IN A MORE PROPORTIONAL DIVISION OF SEATS. |
|
|
|
THIS FIGURE SHOWS
THE RESULT IF THE VOTES FOR THE MAJOR PARTIES WERE EVENLY SPREAD AMONG
THEIR CANDIDATES: NAMELY, 3 TO 2 (3 ALP AND 2 LIB) |
Click here to compare to 1-A.
|
|
Quota = 26,641
|
 |
IF THE VOTE OF A PARTY WERE SPREAD EVENLY OVER ITS 3
CANDIDATES, ALL WOULD BE AHEAD OF THE INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE. |
(EACH COLUMN REPRESENTS THE NO. OF VOTES RECEIVED BY THE
RESPECTIVE CANDIDATES) |
|
|
|
AS THE CANDIDATE WITH THE LEAST VOTES,
IS NOW THE INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE, DR. TURNBULL, HE WOULD BE EXCLUDED, HIS
PREFERENCES THEN DECIDING THE 5TH SEAT. (SEE TEXT FOR FURTHER EXPLANATION
AND FOR REASONS WHY, IN THIS EXAMPLE, A 3-2 DIVISION OF SEATS WOULD BE
MORE EQUITABLE THAN A 2-2-1 RESULT). |
Report to Tasmanian Parliament
by
Dr George Howatt,
Hobart, 1979 |
|
|
This Figure 4-A was digitized by the Proportional
Representation Society of Australia in 2003, from Dr Howatt's Report,
from a copy kindly obtained from the Library of the Parliament of Tasmania
by Hon. Neil Robson. |
|